Jones v. Coweta Fertilizer Co.

124 S.E. 545, 32 Ga. App. 730, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 612
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 1, 1924·No. 15098·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. In a suit upon a promissory note, which is an action ex contractu, the defendant cannot in an action at law in a city court recover by way of set-off against the plaintiff, upon the ground that the plaintiff is insolvent or a nonresident, damages sustained by the defendant by reason of an alleged tortious act of the plaintiff in having maliciously instituted proceedings in bankruptcy against him. Hecht v. Snook &c. Co., 114 Ga. 921 (41 S. E. 74).

2. The amendment to the defendant’s plea, setting up such defense, was properly stricken.

Judgment ajfi/rmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. 8. Eolderness, Boylcin & Boylcin, for plaintiffs in error. Edil & Jones, Smith & Millican, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Coweta Fertilizer Co., 124 S.E. 545, 32 Ga. App. 730, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 612 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

124 S.E. 545 (Jones v. Coweta Fertilizer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bibb Basket Co. v. Eufaula Bank & Trust Co.
156 S.E. 310 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)