Jones v. Court of Appeals
This text of Jones v. Court of Appeals (Jones v. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7724
CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COURT OF APPEALS; GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; MARVIN B. STEINBERG, Maryland State Judge; ARRIE W. DAVIS, Maryland State Judge; DIANE ELIZABETH KELLER, Assistant Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-3153-RDB)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Court
of Appeals, No. CA-04-3153-RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 7, 2004; entered
Oct. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Court of Appeals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-court-of-appeals-ca4-2004.