Jones v. Council for the Borough of Nuangola

934 A.2d 702
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 21, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 934 A.2d 702 (Jones v. Council for the Borough of Nuangola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Council for the Borough of Nuangola, 934 A.2d 702 (Pa. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the orders of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas dated April 5, 2007, April 13, 2007, and May 3, 2007 are reversed based upon Appellees’ lack of standing to bring an action in quo warran-to. See Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Bd. v. Griffin, 591 Pa. 351, 918 A.2d 87, 93 (2007) (holding that standing to pursue a quo warranto action is limited to public entities such as the Attorney General or the local district attorney, with the exception that private individuals may have standing if specially damaged or able to demonstrate an interest beyond that shared by the citizens of the municipality).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Board v. Griffin
918 A.2d 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
934 A.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-council-for-the-borough-of-nuangola-pa-2007.