Jones v. Council for Borough of Nuangola

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jones v. Council for Borough of Nuangola

934 A.2d 702, 594 Pa. 31, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2527

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 21, 2007·No. Appeal No. 50 MAP 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the orders of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas dated April 5, 2007, April 13, 2007, and May 3, 2007 are reversed based upon Appellees’ lack of standing to bring an action in quo warranto. See Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Bd. v. Griffin, 591 Pa. 351, 918 A.2d 87, 93 (2007) (holding that standing to pursue a quo warranto action is limited to public entities such as the Attorney General or the local district attorney, with the exception that private individuals may have standing if specially damaged or able to demonstrate an interest beyond that shared by the citizens of the municipality).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the orders of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas dated April 5, 2007, April 13, 2007, and May 3, 2007 are reversed based upon Appellees’ lack of standing to bring an action in quo warranto. See Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Bd. v. Griffin, 591 Pa. 351, 918 A.2d 87, 93 (2007) (holding that standing to pursue a quo warranto action is limited to public entities such as the Attorney General or the local district attorney, with the exception that private individuals may have standing if specially damaged or able to demonstrate an interest beyond that shared by the citizens of the municipality).

Jones v. Council for Borough of Nuangola, 934 A.2d 702, 594 Pa. 31, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2527 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

934 A.2d 702 (Jones v. Council for Borough of Nuangola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related