Jones v. Corley
This text of 874 N.E.2d 729 (Jones v. Corley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal brought on behalf of Lucinda Swingearn and Delores Gordon dismissed upon the ground that as to them timely substitution has not been made (see CPLR 1021); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
874 N.E.2d 729, 9 N.Y.3d 886, 842 N.Y.S.2d 765, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 2369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-corley-ny-2007.