Jones v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

390 F. App'x 872
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2010
DocketNo. 09-13479
StatusPublished

This text of 390 F. App'x 872 (Jones v. Connecticut General Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, 390 F. App'x 872 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Jones appeals the denial and termination of long-term disability benefits by Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“CIGNA”). In granting CIG-NA’s motion for summary judgment, the district judge, adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, found that the denial of long-term disability benefits was not arbitrary and capricious. The district court concluded that CIGNA did not ignore any of the medical evidence presented by Jones in her original claim or [873]*873in her subsequent appeals to CIGNA. Further, the district court found that the basis for CIGNA’s decision to deny long-term disability benefits was not arbitrary and capricious.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and the record, and after de novo review, which included the benefit of oral argument, we find that the district court properly granted summary judgment to CIG-NA. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 F. App'x 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-connecticut-general-life-insurance-ca11-2010.