JONES v. COMMISSIONER

1978 T.C. Memo. 454, 37 T.C.M. 1847-58, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in JONES v. COMMISSIONER. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 T.C. 391
United States Tax Court·Decided November 14, 1978·No. Docket No. 8186-76.·Unpublished

Opinion

MARCELLIA JONES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
JONES v. COMMISSIONER
Docket No. 8186-76.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1978-454; 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58; 37 T.C.M. (CCH) 1847-58;
November 14, 1978, Filed
Marcellia Jones, pro se.
Edward I. Foster, for the respondent.

HALL

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HALL, Judge: Respondent determined a $1,918.64 deficiency in petitioner's income tax for 1972, plus an addition to the tax for fraud under section 6653(b) 1 of $959.32.

The sole issue presented in this case is whether petitioner is subject to the fraud penalty.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Petitioner was a resident of Pennsylvania when she filed her petition. She filed her 1972 income tax return using the cash basis method of accounting.

On Schedule A to her return for 1972 petitioner claimed, among other deductions, the following itemized deductions:

Real Estate Taxes $ 212.00
Contributions
Religious $ 400
Charitable500
Educational600
Civic4001,900.00
Home mortgage interest170.94
Miscellaneous deductions
Educational-Fulbright
Hayes Scholarship Africa$ 2,662
Prof. Organizations125
School Storage Space100
Prof. Conf.50
Prof. Expenses5003,437.00
$ 5,719.94

*59 Petitioner's return was selected for audit and respondent's agent made appointments with petitioner for August 7, 1973; August 31, 1973; November 2, 1973; December 5, 1973; December 19, 1973; March 12, 1974; April 26, 1974; and May 13, 1974. For each occasion she was requested to bring with her verification of medical expenses, real estate taxes, contributions, mortgage interest, casualty losses, dependent care and all miscellaneous deductions. On each occasion petitioner failed to keep the appointment.

Finally, on June 19, 1974, petitioner appeared before Revenue Agent Campese for an audit of her 1972 return. She presented cancelled checks, some medical receipts, and information concerning an educational fellowship. A continuation of the audit was scheduled for June 28, 1974.

On June 28 petitioner presented to Revenue Agent Campese 35 checks in substantiation of some of her itemized deductions for contributions, education expenses, dependent care, medical transportation, professional organizations and professional conferences. 2 She also gave the Revenue Agent the deed to property located at 5315 Wakefield Street, Philadelphia, which deed indicated the owners of the property*60 were petitioner and her mother, Ruth Jones.

*61 All except two of the checks bear petitioner's signature and her printed name and address. These checks were written on petitioner's account which was closed on April 10, 1964, seven years before the year written on the checks. Two checks were written on bank counter checks. The checks were never processed or negotiated by the banks on which they were written or by any other bank. The numerical and chronological orders of the checks do not correspond. Two checks are dated October 16, 1972, but marked paid July 30, 1972. The checks all bear a "paid" stamp with the date paid always the 30th of some month (including February). No check is endorsed in the name of the payee. When the Revenue Agent pointed out to petitioner that the checks had not been processed by a bank, petitioner stated that she did not know who stamped the checks but that she surmised the payees did.

The deed presented by petitioner to the Revenue Agent had been altered. The unaltered deed showed that Ruth Jones alone owned the property. When petitioner claimed a real estate tax deduction of $212 and a home interest deduction of $170.94 on her 1972 return, she knew that she had no ownership interest*62 in the property at 5315 Wakefield Street, Philadelphia.

When petitioner claimed contribution deductions totaling $1,900 and miscellaneous deductions totaling $3,437 on her 1972 return, she knew that a substantial part of these deductions were false. She knowingly attempted to deceive Revenue Agent Campese by presenting fraudulent checks in purported substantiation of these deductions.

On July 20, 1977, this Court granted respondent's motion that undenied allegations of fact set forth in paragraph 6 of the answer be deemed admitted. On May 11, 1978, this Court granted respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution as to the deficiency.

OPINION

The sole issue in this case is whether any part of petitioner's $1,918.64 underpayment of tax in 1972 was due to fraud. Section 6653(b) provides that if any part of an underpayment of tax is due to fraud, an addition to the tax equal to 50 percent of the total underpayment shall be imposed.

Respondent has the burden of proving fraud (section 7454(a)) and clear and convincing evidence is required to carry this burden.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES v. COMMISSIONER, 1978 T.C. Memo. 454, 37 T.C.M. 1847-58, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 58 (tax 1978).

1978 T.C. Memo. 454 (JONES v. COMMISSIONER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Switzer v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 759 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Otsuki v. Commissioner
53 T.C. 96 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Estate of Temple v. Commissioner
67 T.C. 143 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Godeny v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 324 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Spencer v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 442 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Estate of Mazzoni v. Commissioner
451 F.2d 197 (Third Circuit, 1971)