Jones v. Clinton

Eighth Circuit

Jones v. Clinton

138 F.3d 758, 1998 WL 173088

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1998

DocketNo. 98-1696

StatusPublished

This text of 138 F.3d 758 (Jones v. Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Clinton, 138 F.3d 758, 1998 WL 173088 (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Appellants, in an appeal filed prior to the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants, seek to unseal the pleadings and discovery in Jones v. Clinton and Ferguson, No. LR-C-94-290. In view of the grant of summary judgment, we remand the case to the District Court and request that court to consider the need for keeping its confidentiality order in place. Given this disposition, we do not reach the merits of the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed and the matter is remanded to the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellants, in an appeal filed prior to the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants, seek to unseal the pleadings and discovery in Jones v. Clinton and Ferguson, No. LR-C-94-290. In view of the grant of summary judgment, we remand the case to the District Court and request that court to consider the need for keeping its confidentiality order in place. Given this disposition, we do not reach the merits of the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed and the matter is remanded to the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 F.3d 758, 1998 WL 173088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-clinton-ca8-1998.