Jones v. City of Vallejo

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 28, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01199·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYSON JONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-01199-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 14 (ECF No. 25) CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 18 25), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 19 L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 20 clarification. 21 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 22 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” 23 L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, 24 at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 1 || jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, 2 || the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 4 || Dated: April 28, 2025 □ An Spo \L CHI S00 KIM 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 4, jone1 199.24 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 || Case □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ PROTECTIVE” 5. ORDER

1 VERONIC A.F. NEBB City Attorney, SBN 140001 2 BY: KATELYN M. KNIGHT Assistant City Attorney, SBN 264573 3 CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall 555 Santa Clara Street, Third Floor 4 Vallejo, CA 94590 Tel: (707) 648-4545 5 Fax: (707) 648-4687 Email: katelyn.knight@cityofvallejo.net 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO 7 and MATTHEW KOMODA

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10 BRYSON JONES, an individual Case No: 2:24-cv-01199-CSK

11 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 12 v. 141.1

13 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; MATTHEW KOMODA, individually and in 14 his capacity as an official officer of the CITY; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually, 15 jointly, and severally,

16 Defendants.

18 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 20 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 22 Particularly as this matter arises from an incident that is still under criminal investigation. 23 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following 24 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 25 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 26 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 27 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as 1 set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 2 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 3 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to 4 file material under seal. 5 2. DEFINITIONS 6 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 7 information or items under this Order. 8 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 9 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 10 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and for which public disclosure is likely to result in particularized harm 11 and violate privacy interests recognized by law. This information may include: 12 a. files related to the criminal investigation of the incident while the criminal 13 investigation and review and any consequent criminal proceedings are 14 pending; 15 b. juvenile records; 16 c. personnel file records of any peace officer; 17 d. medical records; 18 e. social security numbers and similar sensitive identifying information 19 (unless redacted by order or by agreement of all parties). 20 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside counsel of record where applicable and in- 21 house counsel (as well as their support staff). 22 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 23 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 25 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 26 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 27 responses to discovery in this matter. 1 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent 2 to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 3 a consultant in this action. 4 2.7 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. In- 5 house counsel does not include outside counsel of record or any other outside counsel. 6 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other 7 legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 8 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 9 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this 10 action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 11 that party. 12 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 13 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 14 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 15 Material in this action. 16 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 17 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 18 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 19 subcontractors. 20 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 22 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 23 Producing Party. 24 3. SCOPE 25 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 26 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 27 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material that reveal the source of the 1 Protected Material or that reveal specific information entitled to confidentiality as a matter of 2 law; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might 3 reveal Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. City of Vallejo, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Jones v. City of Vallejo (Jones v. City of Vallejo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.