Jones v. City of North Las Vegas

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJune 11, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00241
StatusUnknown

This text of Jones v. City of North Las Vegas (Jones v. City of North Las Vegas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. City of North Las Vegas, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

1 | |Margaret A. McLetchie, Nevada Bar No. 10931 Alina M. Shell, Nevada Bar No. 11711 21 Leo S. Wolpert, Nevada Bar No. 12658 3 | |MCLETCHIE LAW 602 South Tenth Street 4 | |Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300 5 | |Facsimile: (702) 425-8220 6 | |Email: maggie@nvlitigation.com 7 | |Jennifer L. Braster, Nevada Bar No. 9982 NAYLOR & BRASTER 8 | | 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 g | |Las Vegas, NV 89145 Telephone: (702) 420-7000 10 | |Facsimile: (702) 420-7001 Email: jbraster@nblawnv.com Counsel for Plaintiffs, Genoa Jones and Cornell Tinsley 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . 13 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 | |GENOA JONES and CORNELL TINSLEY, | Case. No.: 2:21-cv-00241-GMN-DJA individuals, 7 Plaintiffs, vs. 18 19) | CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, Nevada, a| #2ROPOSED}STIPULATED 20 Municipal Corporation; SERGEANT SCOTT | PROTECTIVE ORDER SALKOFF, an individual; and OFFICER 21 | □ MICHAEL ROSE, an individual, 22 Defendants. 23 Plaintiffs GENOA JONES and CORNELL TINSLEY and Defendants CITY OF 24 | NORTH LAS VEGAS, SERGEANT SCOTT SALKOFF, and OFFICER MICHAEL ROSE 25 | |by their respective counsel, having agreed to the following and for good cause under Rule 26 | |26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: ar 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. 28 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of

1 | |confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 2 | |disclosure may be warranted under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3| |The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 4 | |disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends to only the 5 | {limited information or items that are entitled under law to treatment as confidential. 6 2. SCOPE. 7 All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery 8 | |requests, and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be 9 | |subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to this 10 | |stipulated protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. A copy 11 | Jof this Order must be included with any subpoena to any third party. Any party, or any third 12 | |party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate documents as Confidential ~ 13} {but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good faith, determined Bs : 2 |that the documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined below, and pursuant to 15 | |the procedure set forth below. 16 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 17 “Confidential Information” shall mean information meriting special protection 18 | /under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable case law. Confidential 19 | |Information does not include information that (a) is in the public domain at the time of 20 | |disclosure; (b) becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; 21 | |(c) the Receiving Party can show was in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of 22 | |disclosure; or (d) the Receiving Party lawfully receives from a Non-party later without 23 | |restriction as to disclosure. 24 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS. 25 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, agents, and 26 | |attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, paralegals, and 27 | |support/ clerical staff). 28 Non-party: any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity

1 | jother than a party. 2 Protected Material: any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information 3 | |that is designated by a Party or Non-party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving 4 | |Party challenges the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is 5 | |not entitled to protection as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court 6 | |for an order designating the material confidential within the time period specified below; or 7 | |(c) the Designating Party withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing. 8 Producing Party: a Party or Non-party that produces Discovery Material in this 9 | Jaction. 10 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 11 Designating Party: a Party or Non-party that designates Discovery Material as 12 | |“CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected ~ 13] |Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. 14 Challenging Party: a party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 15 | |Party’s confidentiality designation. 16 Confidentiality Log: a Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 17| |documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” that includes the Bates numbers of the 18 | |documents designated (or the portions thereof) as “Confidential” and the basis for doing so. 19 | |Each Producing Party shall keep this log cumulatively and re-produce it every time they 20 | |designate something as “CONFIDENTIAL” so that it is a cumulative record of what the 21 | |party has marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” 22 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. 23 Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or 24 | |affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere 25 | |with the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the 26 | |“Confidential” designation. A Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 27 | |Protected Material that includes the Bates numbers of the documents designated (or portions 28 | |thereof) as “CONFIDENTIAL” and the basis for doing so. Documents shall be designated

1 | |“Confidential” prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the 2 | |documents. The designation of documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be accompanied 3 | |}with a Confidentiality Log in the form included at Exhibit A. 4 A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit 5 | |CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the 6 | Jappropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate |for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that 8 | |qualify—so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for 9 | |}which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 10 | |If only a portion or portions of materials on a page or within a document merit protection, a 11 | |Producing Party must so indicate by making appropriate markings in the margins but not 12 | Jover text. The accompanying log should clearly explain which portion is designated as ~ 13] |CONFIDENTIAL. 14 A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for 15 | |inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 16 | |indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 17 | |before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 18 | |“Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and 19 | |produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 20 | |qualify for protection under this Order, and, before producing the specified documents, the |Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected 22 | |Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. City of North Las Vegas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-city-of-north-las-vegas-nvd-2021.