Jones v. City of New York

150 A.D.2d 757, 542 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 A.D.2d 518

Opinion

In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Housing Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated January 27, 1988, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[758]*758The affidavit of an appraisal officer employed by the New York City Housing Authority was insufficient to establish the Authority’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851). Thus we need not reach the issue of the sufficiency of the papers submitted in opposition to the Authority’s motion for summary judgment. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. City of New York, 150 A.D.2d 757, 542 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 757 (Jones v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)