Jones v. City of Minneapolis

20 Minn. 491
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 15, 1874·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Berry, J.

Under the provisions of section 7, sub-cbap. 6, chap. 10, Sp. Laws 1872, (defendant’s charter,) defendant appealed to the district court of Hennepin county from an assessment of damages occasioned to plaintiff by the appropriation of his land for street purposes. From the judgment of the district court upon such appeal, the present appeal is attempted to be taken to this court. But as by section 7, supra, it is declared that “ the judgment of the district, court,” in such cases, “ shall be final,” this appeal must be dismissed. N. Y. C. Railroad vs. Marvin, 11 N. Y. 276 ; Matter of Canal and Walker streets, 12 N. Y. 406; King vs. Mayor of N. Y. 36 N. Y. 182. It is perhaps hardly necessary to add that the stipulation of the parties, that the case should be heard, here, cannot confer a jurisdiction withheld by the statute.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. City of Minneapolis, 20 Minn. 491 (Mich. 1874).

20 Minn. 491 (Jones v. City of Minneapolis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New-York Central Railroad Co. v. . Marvin
11 N.Y. 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 1854)
King v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New York
36 N.Y. 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Matter of Canal and Walker Streets
12 N.Y. 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 1855)