Jones v. City of Miami Beach

190 So. 2d 323
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1966
DocketNo. 35293
StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 323 (Jones v. City of Miami Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. City of Miami Beach, 190 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is also denied.

Petitioner Robert Lee Jones’ petition for attorneys fees is granted in the amount of $250.00 for successfully defending against the cross-petition.

THORNALL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-city-of-miami-beach-fla-1966.