Jones v. City of Jennings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. City of Jennings

962 S.W.2d 411, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 1998 WL 25256

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. City of Jennings. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 898 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 1998·No. No. 72706·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of Jennings appeals from a judgment in favor of Respondent, Tim Jones, remanding to the City for rendition of a written opinion, to include findings of fact and conclusions of law. The City argues the court erred in its decision to remand.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of Jennings appeals from a judgment in favor of Respondent, Tim Jones, remanding to the City for rendition of a written opinion, to include findings of fact and conclusions of law. The City argues the court erred in its decision to remand.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Jones v. City of Jennings, 962 S.W.2d 411, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 1998 WL 25256 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

962 S.W.2d 411 (Jones v. City of Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.