Jones v. City of Homestead

408 So. 2d 618, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1981·No. No. 81-225·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rudolph Jones appeals from an adverse summary judgment and from a subsequent denial of his motion to amend his complaint. We reverse. The summary judgment herein was based entirely on the plaintiff’s failure to state a cause of action against the City of Homestead in his complaint and, under the circumstances, it was reversible error for the trial court to deny the plaintiff an opportunity to cure this pleading defect by filing an amended complaint. Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So.2d 236 (Fla.1963); Purinson v. Antenna Specialists, Co., 408 So.2d 618 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Plyser v. Hados, 388 So.2d 1284 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. City of Homestead, 408 So. 2d 618, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

408 So. 2d 618 (Jones v. City of Homestead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yorke v. Noble
466 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)