Jones v. City of Atlanta
28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
Opinion
1. The defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the violation of a city ordinance. No attack was made on the validity of the ordinance in the trial court. This being true, this court is without authority of law to consider whether the ordinance is valid. O’Quinn v. Mayor & Council of Homerville, 42 Ga. App. 628 (157 S. E. 109).
2. The evidence amply sustains the verdict. The court did not err in dismissing the certiorari for any of the reasons assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. City of Atlanta, 28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).
28 S.E.2d 657 (Jones v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Quinn v. Mayor of Homerville
157 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)