Jones v. City of Atlanta
This text of 28 S.E.2d 657 (Jones v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the violation of a city ordinance. No attack was made on the validity of the ordinance in the trial court. This being true, this court is without authority of law to consider whether the ordinance is valid. O’Quinn v. Mayor & Council of Homerville, 42 Ga. App. 628 (157 S. E. 109).
2. The evidence amply sustains the verdict. The court did not err in dismissing the certiorari for any of the reasons assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1944.