Jones v. City of Atlanta

28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 8, 1944
Docket30309.
StatusPublished

This text of 28 S.E.2d 657 (Jones v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. City of Atlanta, 28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Gardner, J.

1. The defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the violation of a city ordinance. No attack was made on the validity of the ordinance in the trial court. This being true, this court is without authority of law to consider whether the ordinance is valid. O’Quinn v. Mayor & Council of Homerville, 42 Ga. App. 628 (157 S. E. 109).

2. The evidence amply sustains the verdict. The court did not err in dismissing the certiorari for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Quinn v. Mayor of Homerville
157 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.E.2d 657, 70 Ga. App. 500, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1944.