Jones v. Chopra

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedSeptember 15, 2023
DocketCivil Action No. 2018-2132
StatusPublished

This text of Jones v. Chopra (Jones v. Chopra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Chopra, (D.D.C. 2023).

Opinion

EXHIBIT 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND FAIRNESS HEARING. If you are African American, Black, and/or Hispanic and were employed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”) at any time between February 13, 2011 and April 19, 2022, and served during that time in a non-supervisory position(s) that was (1) assigned to the Bureau’s Office of Consumer Response, (2) in pay bands identified by the Bureau as 4, 4A, 4B, 40, 41, 5, 5A, 5B, 5C, 51, 52, 53, 6, 6A, or 60, and (3) classified by the Bureau as falling within occupational job series code 301 (except that serving in the following positions does not qualify you for class membership: Consumer Response Implementation Manager (position description #110090), Consumer Response Manager (Quality Control) (position description #111410), Policy Analyst (position description #110210), or Consumer Response Analyst (position description #110770)), a class action settlement will affect your rights.

A federal court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

On [preliminary approval date], Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement in the lawsuit Jones v. Chopra, Civil Action No. 18-cv-2132. The Court ordered this notice to inform you of your rights and options under the Settlement. The proposed Settlement will provide a Settlement Fund of $6 million for a class of certain African American, Black, and/or Hispanic CFPB employees to resolve claims of race discrimination and retaliation against the Bureau.

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement: Do Nothing Wait for the Court. Stay in the lawsuit. Seek money if the Court approves the (for now) Settlement. Give up certain rights. and Wait The Court still must decide whether to approve the Settlement. If you wish to participate in the Settlement, you may wait for further notice. If the Court approves the Settlement, you will be mailed a separate notice about your rights and what you must do to seek money from the Settlement. Exclude Opt out of the Settlement’s monetary relief. Receive no money from the Yourself Settlement. Keep any rights to sue CFPB separately for the claims in this lawsuit. (Opt Out) You must opt out, or seek exclusion from, the Settlement by [45 days after mailing Notice]. Comment Write to the Court about your view of the Settlement or why you don’t think it is or Object fair to the class. You must object to the Settlement by [45 days after mailing Notice] These options—and the deadlines to exercise them—are explained in this notice.

1 What This Notice Contains TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Purpose of This Notice...................................................................................................... 2 2. Background: About the Lawsuit ........................................................................................ 2 3. Class Definition................................................................................................................ 3 4. Summary of Settlement Terms .......................................................................................... 4 5. How to Proceed: Your Options ......................................................................................... 4 6. What Will Happen If the Settlement Is Approved .............................................................. 6 7. Release ............................................................................................................................ 6 8. How Will My Settlement Award Be Calculated? ............................................................... 6 9. Are There Tax Consequences for Any Money I Might Get? ............................................... 8 10. The Lawyers Representing You and the Class ................................................................... 8 11. Terms and Payments Specific to the Named Plaintiffs........................................................ 9 12. The Fairness Hearing........................................................................................................ 9 13. Getting More Information ................................................................................................. 9

1. Purpose of This Notice The purpose of this notice is to inform you about: (i) this lawsuit, (ii) the Settlement and Settlement Class definition that the Court has preliminarily approved, and (iii) your legal rights and options in connection with the Settlement and a hearing to be held before the Court on [date of Fairness Hearing], to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement and related matters. This notice also describes the steps to be taken by those who wish to be excluded from the Class or to object to the Settlement, and, for those who remain in the Class, the steps necessary to seek a share of the Settlement Fund if the Court approves the Settlement.

2. Background: About the Lawsuit

In 2014, Plaintiffs Carzanna Jones and Heynard Paz-Chow retained Class Counsel to represent them with respect to their claims of race discrimination in employment against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. On July 25, 2014, Paz-Chow filed an Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) administrative complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation with the Bureau’s Office of Civil Rights. On November 12, 2014, Jones filed an EEO administrative complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation with the Bureau’s Office of Civil Rights, also alleging systemic discrimination against herself and other similarly situated employees. On September 13, 2018, Jones and Paz-Chow filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) in the Court to initiate a putative class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against the Defendants pursuant to 42

2 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq., among other claims. This Complaint alleged, among other things, that Blacks or African Americans and Hispanics employed as Consumer Response Specialists were subjected to and harmed by the Bureau’s agency-wide discriminatory and retaliatory policies and practices, including paying the Named Plaintiffs lower wages than non-minority employees because of their race or color, and discrimination in other terms and conditions of their employment. On December 6, 2018, the Complaint was amended, with leave of Court. The amended complaint describes Plaintiffs’ claims and can be found at [insert website url]. The lawsuit is known as Jones, et al. v. Chopra et al., Civil Action No. 18-cv-2132.

The Bureau denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit, including alleged liability under federal, state, or local anti-discrimination laws, and denies that the Named Plaintiffs or Class Members are entitled to any relief. The Court has not made, and will not make, any determination on the merits of this matter or decide who is right and who is wrong. By entering into the proposed Settlement, the Bureau does not admit any wrongdoing. The Settlement resolves claims of race and color discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in terms and conditions of employment, including claims brought or that could have been brought in the lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., as well as state and local anti-discrimination laws.

The Court has reviewed the Settlement and has preliminarily approved it as being fair, adequate, and reasonable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2000
2 U.S.C. § 2000
Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. Chopra, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-chopra-dcd-2023.