Jones v. Cheairs

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: July 1, 2024
• Docket: 2:23-cv-01730
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 TERENCE JONES, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01730-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 v. 13 MELANIE R. CHEAIRS et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff Terence Jones, who is proceeding 17 pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on November 9, 2023. Dkt. No. 1.1 In the 18 intervening months, no proof of service has been filed, no Defendant has appeared, and no party 19 has filed anything. 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 21 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court . . . must dismiss the action without prejudice against 22 that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” In addition, plaintiffs have a 23 1 Mr. Jones did not file summonses for the Clerk of the Court to sign, and the Clerk’s office mailed blank summonses 24 to him on February 27, 2024. Feb. 27, 2024 Minute Order. 1 general duty to prosecute their claims, see Fid. Phila. Tr. Co. v. Pioche Mines Consol., Inc., 587 2 F.2d 27, 29 (9th Cir. 1978), and they fail to fulfill this duty when they do not litigate their case, 3 see, e.g., Spesock v. U.S. Bank, NA, No. C18-0092-JLR, 2018 WL 5825439, at *3 (W.D. Wash. 4 Nov. 7, 2018). “[T]o prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid

5 congestion in the calendars of the District Courts,” federal courts may exercise their inherent power 6 to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629–31 7 (1962); see also, e.g., Ville v. Meridian at Stone Creek Assisted Living, No. C17-913-MJP, 2017 8 WL 4700340, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 19, 2017). More than 90 days have passed since the 9 summonses were issued, and there is no indication that Mr. Jones has served any of the Defendants 10 or taken any steps to pursue this case. 11 The Court thus ORDERS Mr. Jones to show cause why the case should not be dismissed 12 for failure to prosecute and failure to serve within 30 days of this Order. Failure to respond will 13 result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. 14 Dated this 1st day of July, 2024.

15 A 16 Lauren King United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24