Jones v. Carr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. Carr

193 S.E.2d 255, 127 Ga. App. 332, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 873

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 25, 1972

Docket47399

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.E.2d 255 (Jones v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Carr, 193 S.E.2d 255, 127 Ga. App. 332, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 873 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant in a personal injury action appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment. Giving the plaintiff the benefit of all inferences, there are genuine issues of fact on whether defendant actually furnished his son with an automobile and whether defendant had the right of control over the [333]*333automobile so as to make him liable under the family purpose doctrine. The burden would, of course, be different on a motion for a directed verdict. The court did not err in denying the motion for summary judgment.

Argued September 8, 1972 Decided September 25, 1972 Rehearing denied October 17, 1972. Burt, Burt & Rentz, H. P. Burt, for appellant. Abner B. Dismukes, Clarence A. Miller, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant in a personal injury action appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment. Giving the plaintiff the benefit of all inferences, there are genuine issues of fact on whether defendant actually furnished his son with an automobile and whether defendant had the right of control over the [333]*333automobile so as to make him liable under the family purpose doctrine. The burden would, of course, be different on a motion for a directed verdict. The court did not err in denying the motion for summary judgment.

Argued September 8, 1972 Decided September 25, 1972 Rehearing denied October 17, 1972. Burt, Burt & Rentz, H. P. Burt, for appellant. Abner B. Dismukes, Clarence A. Miller, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 S.E.2d 255, 127 Ga. App. 332, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-carr-gactapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack