Jones v. Carper

2 Tenn. Ch. R. 626
CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedApril 15, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Tenn. Ch. R. 626 (Jones v. Carper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Carper, 2 Tenn. Ch. R. 626 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1876).

Opinion

The Chancellor :

— Motion to take the answer from the files because not signed by the defendant.

Although the bill, as in this case, waive an answer under oath, the answer should regularly be signed by the defendant, and, if not signed, a motion will lie to take it off the file for the irregularity. Denison v. Bassford, 7 Paige, 370; Kimball v. Ward, Walk. Ch. 439; Cook v. Dews, 2 Tenn. Ch. 496. But the irregularity by reason of the want of signature may be waived by the complainant, and the filing of a replication is evidence of a waiver. Fulton Bank v. Beach, 2 Paige, 307. By statute in this state the filing of a replication is prohibited. Code, § 4322. The complainant is allowed twenty days after notice of the filing of an answer to except ( § 4400), and, if he fail to except within that time, the cause is at issue, as if replication had been filed. Code, §§ 4328, 4401, 4432. Allowing the cause to go to issue as upon replication is equivalent to filing a replication, and equally waives an irregularity. Motion disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fulton Bank v. Beach
2 Paige Ch. 307 (New York Court of Chancery, 1830)
Denison v. Bassford
7 Paige Ch. 370 (New York Court of Chancery, 1839)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Tenn. Ch. R. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-carper-tennctapp-1876.