Jones v. Cardoso

4 F. App'x 520
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2001·No. Nos. 00-55038, 00-55055; BAP Nos. CC-98-01425-BKT, CC-98-01428-BKT·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Yvonne B. Jones appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision granting summary judgment to defendants in Jones’ adversary proceeding alleging violation of the automatic stay in her Chapter 13 bankruptcy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

We review decisions of the BAP de novo and independently review rulings of the bankruptcy court. See Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim (In re Kim), 130 F.3d 863, 865 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm the bankruptcy [521] court’s rulings for the reasons stated in the BAP’s Memorandum of September 10, 1999.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Cardoso, 4 F. App'x 520 (9th Cir. 2001).

4 F. App'x 520 (Jones v. Cardoso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim
130 F.3d 863 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)