Jones v. Cardoso
This text of 4 F. App'x 520 (Jones v. Cardoso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Yvonne B. Jones appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision granting summary judgment to defendants in Jones’ adversary proceeding alleging violation of the automatic stay in her Chapter 13 bankruptcy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).
We review decisions of the BAP de novo and independently review rulings of the bankruptcy court. See Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim (In re Kim), 130 F.3d 863, 865 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm the bankruptcy [521]*521court’s rulings for the reasons stated in the BAP’s Memorandum of September 10, 1999.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. App'x 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-cardoso-ca9-2001.