Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp.

123 F. App'x 119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2473

StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. App'x 119 (Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp., 123 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wardell Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Capital One Financial Corporation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Capital One Fin. Corp., No. CA-04-512 (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wardell Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Capital One Financial Corporation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Capital One Fin. Corp., No. CA-04-512 (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F. App'x 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-capital-one-financial-corp-ca4-2005.