Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp.
123 F. App'x 119
Opinion
Wardell Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Capital One Financial Corporation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Capital One Fin. Corp., No. CA-04-512 (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp., 123 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2005).
123 F. App'x 119 (Jones v. Capital One Financial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.