Jones v. . Candler

145 S.E. 691, 196 N.C. 382, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 S.E. 691 (Jones v. . Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. . Candler, 145 S.E. 691, 196 N.C. 382, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 381 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

George W. Jones made entry to certain lands in Buncombe County under C. S., 7554, alleging the same to be vacant and unappropriated. Protest was filed by W. G. Candler, acting on behalf of himself and as agent for the heirs of Loucinda Candler, under C. S., 7557, claiming title to the whole of the lands covered by the entry.

The enterer offered in evidence, for the purpose of attack, two grants covering the land in controversy and under which the protestants claim title thereto. It is alleged that said grants are void because not registered within twelve months, the time prescribed in each grant for its registration. But the grants are not in the record, hence we cannot say there was error in the respect imputed.

Appellant is required to show error; it is not presumed. In re Ross, 182 N. C., 477, 109 S. E., 365.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. McKay
152 S.E. 893 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 691, 196 N.C. 382, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-candler-nc-1928.