Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms

239 F. App'x 372
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2007·No. No. 07-15670·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s prisoner civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, appellant’s constitutional challenges to the application of the California Determinate Sentencing Law to appellant’s parole proceedings are foreclosed by this court’s decision in Connor v. Estelle, 981 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.1992).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms, 239 F. App'x 372 (9th Cir. 2007).

239 F. App'x 372 (Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Eugene Fred Connor v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
981 F.2d 1032 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)