Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms
This text of 239 F. App'x 372 (Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s prisoner civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, appellant’s constitutional challenges to the application of the California Determinate Sentencing Law to appellant’s parole proceedings are foreclosed by this court’s decision in Connor v. Estelle, 981 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.1992).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F. App'x 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-california-board-of-prison-terms-ca9-2007.