Jones v. Byrd

74 Ill. 115
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We deem it necessary to notice but a single error assigned upon this record. Suit was commenced by attachment, and notice given to defendant by publication. There was no personal service on the defendant, but she appeared, after default, and moved to set it aside. Upon this the court rendered judgment that the “plaintiff have and recover of the defendant his damages, $463.65, in form aforesaid assessed, together with his costs and charges in this behalf expended, and have execution therefor.

The appearance and entry of the motion to set aside the default, did not constitute a general appearance and authorize a personal judgment. If any judgment was authorized, it shoitld have been m rem only. Klemm v. Dewes, 28 Ill. 317.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Byrd, 74 Ill. 115 (Ill. 1874).

74 Ill. 115 (Jones v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rorick v. Stilwell
133 So. 609 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)