Jones v. Byrd

74 Ill. 115
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ill. 115 (Jones v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Byrd, 74 Ill. 115 (Ill. 1874).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We deem it necessary to notice but a single error assigned upon this record. Suit was commenced by attachment, and notice given to defendant by publication. There was no personal service on the defendant, but she appeared, after default, and moved to set it aside. Upon this the court rendered judgment that the “plaintiff have and recover of the defendant his damages, $463.65, in form aforesaid assessed, together with his costs and charges in this behalf expended, and have execution therefor.

The appearance and entry of the motion to set aside the default, did not constitute a general appearance and authorize a personal judgment. If any judgment was authorized, it shoitld have been m rem only. Klemm v. Dewes, 28 Ill. 317.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rorick v. Stilwell
133 So. 609 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ill. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-byrd-ill-1874.