Jones v. Butler
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,
Mark Jacob Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Butler, No. 2:15-cv-00316-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. June 30, 2016). We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
671 F. App'x 60 (Jones v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.