Jones v. Buncombe County Sheriff's Office

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 2008
Docket08-8024
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jones v. Buncombe County Sheriff's Office (Jones v. Buncombe County Sheriff's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Buncombe County Sheriff's Office, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8024

RICCARDO DARNELL JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CURRY RAY; VAN DUNCAN; LT. SALYER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00390-GCM)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Riccardo Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Riccardo Darnell Jones seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motions for in camera review and

appointment of counsel and dismissing some but not all parties

from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Jones seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further deny Jones’ motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. Buncombe County Sheriff's Office, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-buncombe-county-sheriffs-office-ca4-2008.