Jones v. Buck
This text of 214 N.E.2d 180 (Jones v. Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On August 18, 1965, the petitioner filed in this court his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, he alleges that his conviction of second degree burglary in the Morgan County Superior Court on February 27, 1964, was secured on perjured testimony.
It is, of course, well, settled that the Supreme Court of Indiana does not have jurisdiction to entertain petitions for writs of habeas corpus.
If the petitioner has a meritorious ground for relief, he can seek his remedy pursuant to Rule 2-40 of this court.
The petition is denied.
Myers, C. J., Arterburn and Jackson, JJ., concur. Achor J., not participating.
Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 180.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 N.E.2d 180, 247 Ind. 198, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-buck-ind-1966.