Jones v. Buck

214 N.E.2d 180, 247 Ind. 198, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 326
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1966
DocketNo. 0-787
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 N.E.2d 180 (Jones v. Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Buck, 214 N.E.2d 180, 247 Ind. 198, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 326 (Ind. 1966).

Opinion

Rakestkaw, J.

On August 18, 1965, the petitioner filed in this court his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, he alleges that his conviction of second degree burglary in the Morgan County Superior Court on February 27, 1964, was secured on perjured testimony.

It is, of course, well, settled that the Supreme Court of Indiana does not have jurisdiction to entertain petitions for writs of habeas corpus.

If the petitioner has a meritorious ground for relief, he can seek his remedy pursuant to Rule 2-40 of this court.

The petition is denied.

Myers, C. J., Arterburn and Jackson, JJ., concur. Achor J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 180.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Castor
214 N.E.2d 180 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 N.E.2d 180, 247 Ind. 198, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-buck-ind-1966.