Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Jones v. Bradford

Jones v. Bradford

60 N.E. 1125, 27 Ind. App. 698, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 130
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 28, 1901
DocketNo. 3,768
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.E. 1125 (Jones v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Bradford, 60 N.E. 1125, 27 Ind. App. 698, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 130 (Ind. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Black, C. J.

— Under an assignment that the court erred in overruling their motion for a new trial, appellants have discussed the evidence; but there can be no decision upon the merits, for the reason that the evidence is not presented by a bill of exceptions, an ineffectual attempt being made to bring it into the record by the method provided in the sixth section of the act of 1899. Acts 1899, p. 384. See Adams v. State, 156 Ind. 596; Anderson v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co., 26 Ind. App. 196; Shirk v. Lingeman, 26 Ind. App. 630; Horner v. Clark, ante, 6.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. State
59 N.E. 24 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Anderson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
59 N.E. 396 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Shirk v. Lingeman
59 N.E. 941 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.E. 1125, 27 Ind. App. 698, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-bradford-indctapp-1901.