Jones v. Bouriogiannis, No. Cv93 529454 (Apr. 13, 1994)
This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 3938 (Jones v. Bouriogiannis, No. Cv93 529454 (Apr. 13, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The legal sufficiency of an indemnification claim can, of course, be tested by means of a motion to strike. Atkinson v Berloni,
Atkinson, which follows and in part interprets Ferryman, makes clear that for there to be a recognizable claim for indemnification there must be an "independent legal relationship" between the parties,
It is also true that the Bikakis cross-complaint does not allege that Pierce had exclusive control over the situation — that might be a difficult task in what was after all a multi-vehicle accident.
The motion to strike is granted.
Corradino, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 3938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-bouriogiannis-no-cv93-529454-apr-13-1994-connsuperct-1994.