Jones v. Booth
102 S.E. 832, 150 Ga. 121, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 77
Opinion
1. Under the evidence submitted no other verdict than the one directed could have been rendered. Accordingly, the judge did not err in directing the verdict for the plaintiff.
2. There was a substantial compliance with the statute (Civil Code, § 5321) in regard to the issuance of an alias fi. fa. Ward v. Miller, 143 Ga. 164 (84 S. E. 480).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Booth, 102 S.E. 832, 150 Ga. 121, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 77 (Ga. 1920).
102 S.E. 832 (Jones v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sells v. Sells
58 S.E.2d 186 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)