Jones v. Booth

102 S.E. 832, 150 Ga. 121, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 77
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 15, 1920
DocketNo. 1651
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 832 (Jones v. Booth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Booth, 102 S.E. 832, 150 Ga. 121, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 77 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. Under the evidence submitted no other verdict than the one directed could have been rendered. Accordingly, the judge did not err in directing the verdict for the plaintiff.

2. There was a substantial compliance with the statute (Civil Code, § 5321) in regard to the issuance of an alias fi. fa. Ward v. Miller, 143 Ga. 164 (84 S. E. 480).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent for providential cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sells v. Sells
58 S.E.2d 186 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 832, 150 Ga. 121, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-booth-ga-1920.