Jones v. Barnett Bank

670 So. 2d 1195, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3468, 1996 WL 154460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1996·No. No. 95-1535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal for failure to state a cause of action. Drozinski v. Straub, 383 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); § 658.55 Fla. Stat. (1989).1 The statute does not determine ownership of the withdrawn funds but it does establish that a bank is not liable for having paid them as they were titled. There is no evidence of any written or verbal undertaking by Barnett Bank not to redeem the CD without presentation of the certificate.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Barnett Bank, 670 So. 2d 1195, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3468, 1996 WL 154460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1195 (Jones v. Barnett Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drozinski v. Straub
383 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)