Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro

65 S.E. 43, 6 Ga. App. 389, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 311

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 29, 1909

Docket1752

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 43 (Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro, 65 S.E. 43, 6 Ga. App. 389, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

Tb'e evidence amply warranted the verdict. Under the testimony in the case, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the questions as to fraud. The case was fairly tried and was free from material error. Judgment affirmed.

Levy and claim, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. October 21, 1908.

Submitted May 21, Decided June 29, 1909. E. J. Fullbright, for plaintiff in error. Lawson & Scales, F. L. Brinson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

Tb'e evidence amply warranted the verdict. Under the testimony in the case, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the questions as to fraud. The case was fairly tried and was free from material error. Judgment affirmed.

Levy and claim, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. October 21, 1908.

Submitted May 21, Decided June 29, 1909. E. J. Fullbright, for plaintiff in error. Lawson & Scales, F. L. Brinson, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.E. 43, 6 Ga. App. 389, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-bank-of-waynesboro-gactapp-1909.