Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro

65 S.E. 43, 6 Ga. App. 389, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 311

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1909·No. 1752·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

Tb'e evidence amply warranted the verdict. Under the testimony in the case, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the questions as to fraud. The case was fairly tried and was free from material error. Judgment affirmed.

Levy and claim, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. October 21, 1908.

Submitted May 21, Decided June 29, 1909. E. J. Fullbright, for plaintiff in error. Lawson & Scales, F. L. Brinson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

Tb'e evidence amply warranted the verdict. Under the testimony in the case, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the questions as to fraud. The case was fairly tried and was free from material error. Judgment affirmed.

Levy and claim, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. October 21, 1908.

Submitted May 21, Decided June 29, 1909. E. J. Fullbright, for plaintiff in error. Lawson & Scales, F. L. Brinson, contra.

Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro, 65 S.E. 43, 6 Ga. App. 389, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

65 S.E. 43 (Jones v. Bank of Waynesboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.