Jones v. Aug. Wright Co.
This text of 184 F. 987 (Jones v. Aug. Wright Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below properly found that the appellant was not engaged chiefly in farming and the tillage of the soil, and was impelled to the conclusion that the appellant committed the act of bankruptcy alleged by the petitioning creditors, that at the time of the filing of the petition he was insolvent, and that, being so insolvent, he did prefer certain of his creditors, who then held his notes, which had been theretofore executed for value by him, and were then held by the banks in Petersburg, Va., as was shown by the testimony submitted to said court. We find no error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 F. 987, 106 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-aug-wright-co-ca4-1910.