Jones v. Alston
This text of 1 Seld. Notes 165 (Jones v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judgment or decree concludes the parties only as to the grounds covered by it, and the facts necessary to uphold it.
Where a bill was filed by an heir-at-law against other heirs and devisees claiming under a will, alleging that the will, though duly executed, was in terms repugnant to law, and void, and praying that it might be declared void; and some of the defendants answered, admitting that they were advised and believed that the will, if duly executed, was nevertheless void; but the bill was dismissed on the ground that the will was not in its terms repugnant to law, or void, the question of its execution not being passed upon: Held, in a subsequent suit, that the defendants who had answered as stated above were not estopped from contesting the due execution of the will.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Seld. Notes 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-alston-ny-1853.