Jones v. Alexander

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Jones v. Alexander

2 Mass. 36

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Mass. 36 (Jones v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Alexander, 2 Mass. 36 (Mass. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

* The Court,

after some argument, unanimously admit- [ * 37 ] ted the evidence ; and there was a verdict for the defendant. Afterwards, the Chief Justice being present, Parsons, for the plaintiff, moved for a new trial, on the ground that the evidence was improperly admitted. The Court unanimously refused to sustain the motion, or to go into the examination of the propriety of admitting the evidence, it having been admitted by a quorum of the Court; and particularly, as the point was not, by the plaintiff’s coun sel, requested at the trial to be reserved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

* The Court,

after some argument, unanimously admit- [ * 37 ] ted the evidence ; and there was a verdict for the defendant. Afterwards, the Chief Justice being present, Parsons, for the plaintiff, moved for a new trial, on the ground that the evidence was improperly admitted. The Court unanimously refused to sustain the motion, or to go into the examination of the propriety of admitting the evidence, it having been admitted by a quorum of the Court; and particularly, as the point was not, by the plaintiff’s coun sel, requested at the trial to be reserved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mass. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-alexander-mass-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack