Jones v. Aldrich

New York Supreme Court

Jones v. Aldrich

2 How. Pr. 159

DecidedJune 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 159 (Jones v. Aldrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Aldrich, 2 How. Pr. 159 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

It was. objected that the notice of motion should have been for judgment of non pros. ; that defendant could not move for it under his notice for judgment, as in case of nonsuit.

Jewett, Justice.

Held, that the plaintiff was not misled •

by the notice, it was evident from the papers themselves what the notice should have been; it was not such an irregularity but what the defendant might move for judgment of nonpros. Motion for judgment of non pros, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It was. objected that the notice of motion should have been for judgment of non pros. ; that defendant could not move for it under his notice for judgment, as in case of nonsuit.

Jewett, Justice.

Held, that the plaintiff was not misled •

by the notice, it was evident from the papers themselves what the notice should have been; it was not such an irregularity but what the defendant might move for judgment of nonpros. Motion for judgment of non pros, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-aldrich-nysupct-1846.