Jones v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd.
This text of 878 N.E.2d 27 (Jones v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summit App. No. 23934. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s emergency motion for stay of demolition of the house at 444 Blairwood Drive,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Furthermore, it appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due December 17, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
878 N.E.2d 27, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-akron-hous-appeals-bd-ohio-2007.