Jones v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd.

878 N.E.2d 27, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1448
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 2007·No. 2007-2171·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23934. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s emergency motion for stay of demolition of the house at 444 Blairwood Drive,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Furthermore, it appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due December 17, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd., 878 N.E.2d 27, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 2007).

878 N.E.2d 27 (Jones v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.