Jones v. Advance-Rumley Thrasher Co.
95 S.E. 378, 22 Ga. App. 58, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 145
Opinion
1. The holder of a note is presumed to be such bona fide and for value. Civil Code (1910), § 4288.
2. There is nothing in the record to rebut the legal presumption above referred to; and under the testimony adduced the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See, in this connection, Edwards &c. Co. v. Vidalia Grocery Co., 144 Ga. 514 (87 S. E. 675, L. R. A. 1916D, 624).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Advance-Rumley Thrasher Co., 95 S.E. 378, 22 Ga. App. 58, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
95 S.E. 378 (Jones v. Advance-Rumley Thrasher Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards & Deutsch Lithographing Co. v. Vidalia Grocery Co.
87 S.E. 675 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)