Jones v. AAA Automotive Club of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. AAA Automotive Club of Missouri

217 S.W.3d 355, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 468, 2007 WL 821939

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2007·No. No. ED 88343·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dana Jones (“Claimant ) appeals the final decision issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) finding Claimant was not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm the decision of the Commission. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on [356] the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dana Jones (“Claimant ) appeals the final decision issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) finding Claimant was not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm the decision of the Commission. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on [356] the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Jones v. AAA Automotive Club of Missouri, 217 S.W.3d 355, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 468, 2007 WL 821939 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

217 S.W.3d 355 (Jones v. AAA Automotive Club of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.