Jones v. 2 Bros. Services, LLC

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 11, 2024
DocketCAAP-23-0000610
StatusPublished

This text of Jones v. 2 Bros. Services, LLC (Jones v. 2 Bros. Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. 2 Bros. Services, LLC, (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-JAN-2024 07:55 AM Dkt. 18 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

BRONSON JONES and CHASSIDIE JONES, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. 2 BROS. SERVICES, LLC, dba IZZY TOWS IT; KAINOA JUSTIN AH SING; and ISRAEL ALVAREZ, Defendants-Appellants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, self-represented Defendants- Appellants Kainoa Justin Ah Sing and Israel Alvarez appeal from the October 4, 2023 "Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for ** Summary Judgment Against Defendants Kainoa Ahsing [sic] and Israel Alvarez" (October 4, 2023 Order) entered in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit in 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX. The court lacks appellate jurisdiction because the circuit court has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment, see Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994), and the October 4, 2023 Order is not independently appealable under the collateral-order or Forgay1 doctrines, nor has the circuit court granted leave for interlocutory appeal under HRS § 641-1(b). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016)

1 Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848). NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(setting forth the requirements for appealability under the collateral-order doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641- 1(b) (specifying requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, January 11, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forgay v. Conrad
47 U.S. 201 (Supreme Court, 1848)
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright
869 P.2d 1334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Greer v. Baker.
369 P.3d 832 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. 2 Bros. Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-2-bros-services-llc-hawapp-2024.