Jones, Rhonda Renee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Jones, Rhonda Renee

DecidedApril 29, 2009

DocketWR-71,656-01

StatusPublished

This text of Jones, Rhonda Renee (Jones, Rhonda Renee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones, Rhonda Renee, (Tex. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-71,656-01

EX PARTE RHONDA RENEE JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 40,603-A IN THE 71,656-01 DISTRICT COURT

FROM WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and one count of evading arrest, and was sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment for the possession count, and two years' state jail for the evading arrest count. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed her conviction. Jones v. State, No. 02-05-0026-CR (Tex. App. - Fort Worth, April 20, 2006). On discretionary review, this Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals. Jones v. State, No. PD-1170-06 (Tex. Crim. App. October 10, 2007).

On, March 18, 2009, this Court considered Applicant's writ of habeas corpus and denied relief. However, after this Court had received Applicant's writ from the district court, but before this Court denied relief, Applicant filed an amended application in the district court. This Court did not receive Applicant's amended application until after the decision to deny relief had been handed down.

On March 23, 2009, Applicant filed a suggestion that this Court reconsider on its own motion the denial of relief. Because this Court denied relief without considering the grounds and arguments raised in Applicant's amended writ, this Court has decided to reconsider that denial. Based on a full consideration of the grounds and arguments raised in Applicant's first and amended writs, this Court has nevertheless determined that Applicant's claims are without merit. Habeas corpus relief is denied.

It is so ordered on this the 29^th day of April, 2009.

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-71,656-01

EX PARTE RHONDA RENEE JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 40,603-A IN THE 71,656-01 DISTRICT COURT

FROM WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and one count of evading arrest, and was sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment for the possession count, and two years' state jail for the evading arrest count. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed her conviction. Jones v. State, No. 02-05-0026-CR (Tex. App. - Fort Worth, April 20, 2006). On discretionary review, this Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals. Jones v. State, No. PD-1170-06 (Tex. Crim. App. October 10, 2007).

On, March 18, 2009, this Court considered Applicant's writ of habeas corpus and denied relief. However, after this Court had received Applicant's writ from the district court, but before this Court denied relief, Applicant filed an amended application in the district court. This Court did not receive Applicant's amended application until after the decision to deny relief had been handed down.

On March 23, 2009, Applicant filed a suggestion that this Court reconsider on its own motion the denial of relief. Because this Court denied relief without considering the grounds and arguments raised in Applicant's amended writ, this Court has decided to reconsider that denial. Based on a full consideration of the grounds and arguments raised in Applicant's first and amended writs, this Court has nevertheless determined that Applicant's claims are without merit. Habeas corpus relief is denied.

It is so ordered on this the 29^th day of April, 2009.

Do not publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jones, Rhonda Renee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-rhonda-renee-texcrimapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack