Jones & Mann v. Savage

New York Supreme Court

Jones & Mann v. Savage

10 Wend. 621

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1834

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Wend. 621 (Jones & Mann v. Savage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones & Mann v. Savage, 10 Wend. 621 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

This very question of the liability of the attorney to costs, was under consideration when this case was before us on a motion for a new trial, and it was then held that he was liable. 6 Wendell, 660. From the case then presented to us it appeared, not only that the attorney was retained by, but that the suit was prosecuted for the benefit of a resident of the state. So in Waring v. Barret, 2 Cowen, 460, we granted a rule against the attorney, although the real plaintiff, one Brady, was a resident of the state.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

This very question of the liability of the attorney to costs, was under consideration when this case was before us on a motion for a new trial, and it was then held that he was liable. 6 Wendell, 660. From the case then presented to us it appeared, not only that the attorney was retained by, but that the suit was prosecuted for the benefit of a resident of the state. So in Waring v. Barret, 2 Cowen, 460, we granted a rule against the attorney, although the real plaintiff, one Brady, was a resident of the state.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Wend. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-mann-v-savage-nysupct-1834.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack