Jones, Larry Douglas
This text of Jones, Larry Douglas (Jones, Larry Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-52,064-03
EX PARTE LARRY DOUGLAS JONES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 98-149-K368C IN THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual
assault and indecency with a child and sentenced to imprisonment for life and twenty years,
respectively. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Jones v. State, No. 03-98-00639-
CR (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 2, 2000) (not designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that the complainant’s testimony was coached and
coerced. Applicant submitted a document purporting to be an affidavit from the complainant. The
trial court found that this document was fraudulent and concluded that Applicant had abused the 2
writ.
We find that Applicant has submitted false evidence. We dismiss his application and cite
him for abuse of the writ. Applicant has waived and abandoned any contention that he might have
in regard to his convictions, at least insofar as existing claims that he could have or should have
brought in the application. Ex parte Jones, 97 S.W.3d 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Middaugh v.
State, 683 S.W.2d 713 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Emmons, 660 S.W.2d 106 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1983). Additionally, based on Applicant’s submission of false evidence, we find that Applicant
has filed a frivolous lawsuit.
We instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept the instant application
for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application relating to these convictions unless Applicant
shows in such an application that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they
could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton,
602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: August 21, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones, Larry Douglas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-larry-douglas-texcrimapp-2019.