Jones, Jr. v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: November 29, 2011
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2011-1340
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CQURT clerk NUV 2 g 20” FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Cq¢,,ts'fg-r»§h?g?r/,ct 8a CHARLES JoNEs, z 'S"""" of g

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed.

Plaintiff states that "[d]efendants are being sued for negligent tort acts under 28 USC 2671-2675," Am. Compl. [Dkt. #3] at 5, and his claim arises from the mishandling of his personal property upon his transfer from a federal correctional institution to the D.C. Jail, see ia'. at 6. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), see 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-75, "[t]he United States shall be held liable . . . in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances." 28 U.S.C. § 2674. Before initiating a lawsuit in federal court, however, a claimant first must have "presented his to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail." 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Alternatively, if the agency fails "to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed," the claimant may deem the claim denied. Id. Here, it does not appear that plaintiff has submitted an administrative claim to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. ln these circumstances, "[t]he FTCA bars [him] from bringing suit . . . until [he has] exhausted [his] administrative remedies. McNez`l v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, ll3 (1993).

The Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this

same date.

@Mar/e/ MQZ/

United States/ District Judge l

DATE; ij Z@//