Jones, Jonathan Steven

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 2018
DocketWR-87,910-01
StatusPublished

This text of Jones, Jonathan Steven (Jones, Jonathan Steven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, Jonathan Steven, (Tex. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-87,910-01

EX PARTE JONATHAN STEVEN JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. FR 75641-A IN THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault

and sentenced to imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to a direct appeal of the conviction through

no fault of his own. See Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98

S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Trial counsel has provided an affidavit, and the trial court has

entered findings of fact and recommends that a late appeal be granted. The findings and 2

recommendation are supported by the habeas record and applicable law.

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause No. 75641 from the 264th District Court of Bell County. Applicant is ordered

returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the

aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal.

Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App.1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 23, 2018 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Axel
757 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Jones v. State
98 S.W.3d 700 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones, Jonathan Steven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-jonathan-steven-texcrimapp-2018.