Jones, Jerry Dale

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2015
DocketWR-82,443-01
StatusPublished

This text of Jones, Jerry Dale (Jones, Jerry Dale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, Jerry Dale, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,443-01

EX PARTE JERRY DALE JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1407048-A IN THE 178TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance weighing more than one gram but less than four grams, and was sentenced to

three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because less than a week after he entered his plea, the evidence in his case was tested and found to

weigh less than one gram. There were other discrepancies between the charging instrument, the plea papers and the judgment in this case with respect to the type of controlled substance alleged to have

been possessed, and whether or not Applicant pleaded “true” to an enhancement allegation.

On December 10, 2014, this Court remanded to the trial court to resolve the discrepancies

in the record, and to determine whether any errors in the judgment in this case were clerical errors,

subject to correction by way of judgment nunc pro tunc, or judicial errors. The parties have entered

agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court has determined that Applicant’s

decision to plead guilty to possessing more than one gram but less than four grams of a controlled

substance in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent choice. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex

parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1407048 in the 178th District Court of Harris

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to

answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 4, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones, Jerry Dale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-jerry-dale-texcrimapp-2015.