Jones, James Edward

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 2017
DocketWR-85,381-01
StatusPublished

This text of Jones, James Edward (Jones, James Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, James Edward, (Tex. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,381-01

EX PARTE JAMES EDWARD JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D34884-CR-HC-1 IN THE 13TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NAVARRO COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal through no fault of his own. After

appointing habeas counsel and holding an evidentiary hearing, the trial court recommends that a late

appeal be granted, and the State indicates that it is not opposed to the granting of a late appeal. See

Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. 2

App. 1988).

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause No. D34884 from the 13th District Court of Navarro County. Applicant is

ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then,

with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal.

Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 1, 2017 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Axel
757 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones, James Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-james-edward-texcrimapp-2017.