Jones' Heirs v. Adair

27 Ky. 220, 4 J.J. Marsh. 220, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 245
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 28, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Ky. 220 (Jones' Heirs v. Adair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones' Heirs v. Adair, 27 Ky. 220, 4 J.J. Marsh. 220, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 245 (Ky. Ct. App. 1830).

Opinion

Judge Underwood,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There are several irregularities in the proceedings, for which the decree must be reversed. The usual time of six months, after the arrival of the infants to full age, should have been reserved to them, for opening,the decree; see Jameson, &c. vs. Mosely, IV Monroe, 417.

There is no order on the record, appointing a guardian, to defend for the infants. The process was served on McGinty, requesting him to appear and answer at the November term, 1829. The decree was rendered ip the May preceding. The decree is reversed with costs. Upon the return of the cause, as all the defendants to. the bill have appeared in this court, it will no.t b.e necessary to take out process against them.

The court will appoint a guardian ad litem for the infants, and take such other steps, not inconsistent with this opinion, as may be necessary, to bring the cause fairly to trial upon the merits.

McGinty for plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ky. 220, 4 J.J. Marsh. 220, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-heirs-v-adair-kyctapp-1830.