Jones & Guerrero Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Daiwa Navigation Co., Ltd.
356 F.2d 942
Opinion
Upon an examination of the record we conclude that the trial court’s finding that appellant was indebted to appellee was a permissible inference from Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, the Wiseman deposition, and defense counsel’s statement at pretrial conference. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones & Guerrero Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Daiwa Navigation Co., Ltd., 356 F.2d 942 (9th Cir. 1966).
356 F.2d 942 (Jones & Guerrero Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Daiwa Navigation Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.